Space Industry and Business News  
Saving Lockheed Martin

The F-22 -- the most expensive combat aircraft ever built at a total unit cost of over $300 million per copy -- is particularly vulnerable. The Pentagon has already cut back its proposed buy of the aircraft from an original goal of 750 planes to current plans to purchase 183. Further cuts are not out of the question.
by William D. Hartung
UPI Outside View Commentator
New York (UPI) June 01, 2007
Despite its role as the Pentagon's top contractor, Lockheed Martin is searching for some good news after a remarkable series of setbacks in recent months. First came the cancellation of the company's contract to build a second "littoral combat ship" for the Navy after its first ship in the series was plagued by cost overruns and design problems.

Then the U.S. Coast Guard took over the management of its multi-billion Deepwater modernization plan from Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. The decision was due in large part to dangerous flaws in the new Coast Guard cutters the firms were developing.

Last but not least, the company's most high profile product of all, the presidential helicopter, has generated widespread criticism based on high costs and poor performance.

With weapons procurement dollars likely to tighten up as the costs of replacing equipment damaged in Iraq come home to roost, these hits to the company's reputation could strengthen the hand of members of Congress seeking cuts in its two lucrative combat aircraft programs, the F-22 and the F-35.

The F-22 -- the most expensive combat aircraft ever built at a total unit cost of over $300 million per copy -- is particularly vulnerable. The Pentagon has already cut back its proposed buy of the aircraft from an original goal of 750 planes to current plans to purchase 183. Further cuts are not out of the question.

This is where the government of conservative Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe comes into play. He hopes to make Japan the first foreign purchaser of the F-22, in a deal that could be worth $20 billion or more for 100 planes.

A deal on this scale would be a huge shot in the arm for Lockheed Martin's aircraft division. A foreign sale of 100 planes would be more than one-half of the U.S. government's proposed purchase of the F-22. It would keep Lockheed Martin's Georgia and Texas production lines for the plane open for years beyond the projected shutdown date of 2011, during which time legislators from those states could press for additional purchases by the Pentagon.

But there are a number of obstacles between Lockheed Martin and its "deal of the century." First, exports of the F-22 are currently barred by U.S. law. But industry analysts are convinced that Lockheed Martin boosters in Congress could get this provision lifted if the deal looks like a real prospect.

The most important set of concerns has to do with the danger of spurring an arms race in Asia. South Korean officials have expressed alarm at the prospect of Japan receiving F-22s, and have said that they would argue for their own buy of the planes if they are provided to Tokyo. And China would no doubt feel the need to upgrade its own air force in response, especially in light of a U.S. effort to push Taiwan to buy $10 billion worth of U.S.-built submarines and aircraft.

The last thing the United States government should be doing is taking a step to undermine relations with China at a time when Beijing's help is needed to consolidate the deal to curb North Korea's nuclear program.

Japan already has highly capable F-15 combat aircraft from the United States, along with the technology to build significant components of them. This is more than adequate to deal with China's current capabilities, particularly considering that Japan is allied with the United States, whose military far outpaces Beijing's by every measure.

If the time comes when Japan needs a next generation fighter, the less expensive F-35 -- also built by Lockheed Martin -- would be a reasonable alternative.

To a significant degree, Abe's desire for F-22s is based on the alleged prestige that would flow from being the first country to receive the aircraft from the United States. This is not an adequate reason to increase tensions in Asia.

As for Lockheed Martin, it can look elsewhere for a big "win" to distract attention from its recent troubles. If the F-22 program is having a hard time making it here, it shouldn't be bailed out by making a questionable deal over there.

William D. Hartung is a senior research fellow at the World Policy Institute in New York.

United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
Lockheed Martin
The latest information about the Commercial Satellite Industry



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


A Giant Leap For Space Activities In Europe
Paris, France (SPX) May 17, 2007
Ministers in charge of space activities in ESA's Member States and those responsible for the internal market, industry and research in the European Union's Competitiveness Council, are meeting in Brussels on Tuesday 22 May to adopt the European Space Policy.







  • Academic Group Releases Plan To Share Power Over Internet Root Zone Keys
  • Satellite Enables Mobile Wireless Broadband Services To Conventional Devices
  • Singapore Airlines Selects Rockwell Collins Satellite Communications
  • Couch Potatoes On Track For Virtual World

  • Russia Launches Four Satellites Into Orbit For Globalstar
  • Proton-M Carrier With US Telecom Satellite To Lift Off In June
  • Arianespace Maintains Launch Campaign Pace As Another Ariane 5 GEO Truck Takes Form
  • Microgravity Enterprises Launches Commercial Payload From New Mexico Spaceport

  • Australia Fears Jet Flight Guilt Could Hit Tourism
  • Nondestructive Testing Keeps Bagram Aircraft Flying
  • New FAA Oceanic Air Traffic System Designed By Lockheed Martin Fully Operational
  • NASA Seeks New Research Proposals

  • Raytheon Demonstrates Joint C3I Warfighter Interoperability
  • Raytheon's MicroLight Radio Selected For UK Army's FIST Program Testing
  • General Dynamics To Provide Ku-Band Satellite On-the-Move Antenna System To Army
  • Raytheon Awarded USAF Global Broadcast Services Contract

  • Scientists Create Fire-Safe, Green Plastic
  • Canon And Toshiba Delay Launch Of New SED Televisions
  • Quasicrystals: Somewhere Between Order And Disorder
  • Space Technology Creates Investment Opportunities

  • Hall Appoints Feeney To Top GOP Position On Space And Aeronautics Subcommittee
  • Dodgen Joins Northrop Grumman As Vice President Of Strategy For Missile Systems Business
  • Townsend To Lead Ball Aerospace Exploration Systems In Huntsville
  • NASA Nobel Prize Recipient To Lead Chief Scientist Office

  • US Experts Predict Nine Atlantic Hurricanes This Season
  • Space Systems/Loral Awarded NASA Contract For Landsat Data Continuity Mission Accommodation Study
  • Tracking A Hot Spot In The Center Of The Biggest Ocean On Earth
  • MetOp-A Takes Up Service

  • Latest AeroAstro Asset Tracking Satellite Downlink Decoder Ready For Deployment
  • Russian Satellite Navigation Devices On Sale This Year
  • GNSS And ESA Sign Cooperation Agreement For Satellite Navigation Technologies
  • Putin Makes Glonass Navigation System Free For Customers

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement